Experiment Record Review
A structured reading of how a research group currently writes down runs, failures, and follow-up decisions — then a written map of what a later colleague can actually reconstruct.
R&D analytics for experiment tracking
Sourceenginegrid sits with laboratory records — bound books, exported tables, and local files — and writes down what a later colleague can still reconstruct. Visualization work starts from those pages, not from a cleaned slide.
Failed trials stay in the figure. Parked ideas leave the language of live work.
The commercial core is a human reading of experiment records and the innovation pipeline those records feed. The local utility is optional support for sorting the same fields on a laboratory computer.
A structured reading of how a research group currently writes down runs, failures, and follow-up decisions — then a written map of what a later colleague can actually reconstruct.
A facilitated working session that puts every live trial, parked idea, and waiting decision onto one wall so the group can see which experiments still feed the next quarter.
Charts and annotated figures prepared from existing experiment records for a specific decision meeting, with failed runs kept in view rather than cropped out.
Design of paper sheets and local-file fields so a run can be reconstructed later, including optional layout that matches the local tracking utility.
The Experiment Record Review occupies two to four days with the people who wrote the pages. It produces a pipeline sketch and a briefing of record changes the bench can apply without abandoning paper.
Twelve of us stood at the wall for a full afternoon. Two projects everyone still named in stand-up went into the parked pile because no owner would take them. I would not call the day pleasant. The typed list matched the photographs, which is more than our previous tracker did.